Article published Monday, October 6, 2014, at Fox News.

Michael Bloomberg's anti-gun propaganda

By John R. Lott, Jr.

When former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s gun control groups release a report, they consistently garner massive, uncritical news coverage. Alas. With the huge number of factual mistakes in these reports, you would think that reporters would have grown wary of pushing their propaganda.

For example, Bloomberg’s Everytown, Mothers Demand Action, and Mayors Against Illegal guns have been caught padding the number of school shootings. While Everytown claimed 74 school shootings occurred between the Newtown, Connecticut shooting in December 2012 and June 2014, Politifact, which rated Everytown’s claim as “mostly false,” put the number of “incidents such as Sandy Hook or Columbine in which the shooter intended to commit mass murder” at 10.

Every single report released by Bloomberg’s groups has contained major errors. A new report by the Crime Prevention Research Center has corrected Everytown’s July study on “mass shootings”: again, it is no different – lots of errors, but worldwide publicity touting the erroneous claims.

According to this Everytown study, there were 110 mass shootings in the almost six years from January 2009 to July 2014. But that number is heavily padded with residential killings by gangs, within family killings, or murders resulting from some other crime such as a robbery. These murders are also important, but they are different. What motivates a gang fight over drugs is not what motivates a Sandy Hook type mass shooter. These mass killers plan on committing suicide. While drug dealers are motivated by money, the public pass shooters want to kill as many people as possible so that they can get publicity.

Mass public shootings that are not part of gang fight or some other crime are much fewer, 25, not 110. Unfortunately, Everytown hasn’t learned from previous criticisms of their padded numbers with unrelated attacks.

Some errors are trivial, such as getting the ages of killers wrong, but such errors reveal the sloppiness of their reports. They entirely missed the ages of 18 killers. They also misclassified a couple cases of stabbings as shooting deaths.

Others are more significant. According to their July report, only 10 percent of mass shooters have a history of mental illness prior to their attacks. Again, they simply failed to research the cases thoroughly. Out of the 25 mass public shooting cases, they missed that five shooters had histories of clear mental illness. Overall, 52 percent of mass public shooters had histories of mental illness.

Perhaps most importantly, the Everytown report falsely states that 86% of mass shootings occur in places where guns are allowed. They arrive at their high figure primarily by counting attacks in private homes, which they assume allow guns. But the debate has been about attacks

Further, as for public places, they do not correctly identify whether citizens are allowed to defend themselves. Thus, they ignore rules that prevent general citizens from carrying guns (e.g., not acknowledging that Los Angeles County issued only 240 concealed handgun permits to wealthy individuals out of an adult population of 7.6 million adults). They equate allowing police to carry guns as the same thing as letting civilians defend themselves. And they mistakenly rely on news reports to determine whether guns were banned in an area. Unfortunately, the media virtually never mentions that attacks occur in gun-free zones.

In fact, since 2009 (indeed since at least 1950) only two of the mass public shootings have occurred in places where civilians were allowed to defend themselves with guns.

Everytown asserts that attacks involving “assault weapons” were more deadly (7.7 with assault weapons versus 4.7 without). Correcting their simple math errors, no longer counting stabbing deaths as shootings, and consistently defining “assault” rifles, cuts the difference to 6.4 versus 4.9. Even then the difference is driven by just one attack. For all the other mass shootings but Newtown, the lethality of attacks with “assault weapons” is actually slightly less than attacks without them.

With all the hundreds of millions of dollars that Michael Bloomberg is poring into pushing gun control, you would think that he could hire some fact-checkers. But possibly he doesn’t care. Maybe all he really wants is anti-gun propaganda.

Home (description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)

Academic papers:

Social Science Research Network

Book Reviews:

For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.

List of my Op-eds

Posts by topic

Appalachian law school attack

Baghdad murder rate

Arming Pilots

Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me

The Merced Pitchfork Killings and Vin Suprynowicz's quote

Ayres and Donohue

Stanford Law Review

Mother Jones article


Craig Newmark

Eric Rasmusen

William Sjostrom

Dr. T's

Interview with National Review Online

Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide

The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott

Cold Comfort, Economist John Lott discusses the benefits of guns--and the hazards of pointing them out.

An interview with John R. Lott, Jr. author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws

Some data not found at

Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack

Since the first news search was done additional news stories have been added to Nexis:

There are thus now 218 unique stories, and a total of 294 stories counting duplicates (the stories in yellow were duplicates): Excel file for general overview and specific stories. Explicit mentions of defensive gun use increase from 2 to 3 now.

Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election

Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set

"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper