Article published Tuesday April 28, 2015, at Fox News.
Baltimore riots and the price of protest
By John R. Lott, Jr.
People have the right to protest, but too many politicians are afraid or unwilling to stop looting and rioting. The dividing line between liberals and conservatives could hardly be starker.
When the St. Louis Grand Jury reached its decision in Officer Wilson’s shooting of Michael Brown, Democrat Missouri Governor Jay Nixon ignored calls from Ferguson’s mayor and kept the National Guard away from the initial violence. As Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder complained: "[The National Guard]were kept away at the crucial time while Ferguson burned.” The rioting and destruction was hardly a surprise.
Likewise, in Baltimore, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has evoked controversy over her own slow response to the violence. She claims that she was misunderstood when she announced on Saturday: "I worked with the police and I instructed them to do everything that they could to ensure that the protestors could exercise their right to free speech. It is a very delicate balancing act because while we tried to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well. And we worked very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to de-escalate.”
Rawlings-Blake may not have meant what she said about giving "those who wished to destroy space to do that," but her statement was clear enough. In addition, her pattern of slow responses continued through Monday. Despite all the damage, the mayor didn’t even put in the required request for the National Guard until 7 PM Monday evening.
Reportedly the mayor and police commissioner thought that they had the situation under control and worried that the National Guard would provoke the rioters.
Reportedly the mayor and police commissioner thought that they had the situation under control and worried that the National Guard would provoke the rioters. Now it appears that police were ordered to “stand down” when riots broke out on Monday night.
Armored vehicles, body armor, and shields might look threatening, but they keep police safe. In Baltimore, there is a "credible threat" that local gangs are targeting police for murder. Young rioters are hurling rocks and bottles at police. But you can’t expect police to do their job and hold the line against rioters if they fear being maimed or killed.
Indeed, fifteen police were injured during riots on Monday, with two still requiring hospitalization.
The ultimate irony is that politicians who are so careful to give “those who wished to destroy space to do that” are making life exceeding difficult for the law-abiding poor who live in the areas being destroyed. Many businesses looted and burned down aren’t likely to re-open, and the ones that survive will face dramatically higher insurance premiums. The result is fewer jobs and higher prices.
When Democratic Representative Elijah Cummings from Baltimore called on the rioters to stop, he warned: “After all the cameras are gone, we still have to live here.” The costs of slowly responding to rioters are something that many poor blacks in Baltimore will be living with for years to come.
John R. Lott Jr. is the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center and the author of the recently released “At the Brink: Will Obama Push Us Over the Edge?”
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Since the first news search was done additional news stories have been
added to Nexis:
There are thus now 218 unique stories, and a total of 294 stories counting
duplicates (the stories in yellow were duplicates): Excel file for
general overview and specific stories. Explicit mentions of defensive gun use
increase from 2 to 3 now.