Article published Friday, April 10, 2009, at Fox News.

Obama's Education Policy Gets an 'F'

By John R. Lott, Jr.

Teacher unions are ecstatic. It is only April and President Obama has already delivered most of their many wishes.

The "stimulus"package gave teachers large salary increases. And over the pleading of D.C.'s mayor and residents, Obama will phase out the voucher system for poor D.C. residents. Now public school teachers and administrators in the District of Columbia do not need to worry about trying to improve, as the competition was wiped out by the stroke of a pen.

""Who influences the minds of the young is a continuing battle. In comparison to the average parent, unionized American teachers are obviously more liberal, more inclined to support government regulation and spending. Poor D.C. parents no longer have a chance to send their children to private schools such as the ones the Obamas send their own children to.""

And it is a protectionism that has a real cost. A new U.S. Department of Education study released last Fridayconfirms what the parents and children in the program knew: children who had received vouchers since the spring of 2004 had learned the equivalent of 1.5 to 2 years more learning than those students who had stayed in public schools.

Furthermore, Obama's budget blueprints passed by the House and Senate recently will increase the demand for unionized teachers by expanding the trend for more public schooling that was already in the "stimulus" package -- with adding on pre-kindergarten classes as well as lengthening both the school day and the school year.

Despite all the rhetoric about improving American education, Obama has ignored one fact: American children do relatively well compared to children in other countries when the are young. The longer that they are in the American public schooling system, the worst they do. In tests for 4th grade, Americans ranked near the top of both science and math, but American students in 8th grade had fallen to the bottom third of the nations.

Possibly the benefits to the unions are enough to motivate Obama. Possibly Obama really thinks that monopoly government schooling is much better than private competition for the general population, even if it doesn't apply to his own family. But there are other longer term, more subtle consequence to expanding government schooling to younger and younger ages.

Research shows that the countries with the earliest school starting age are the most totalitarian and socialist countries. Time after time, totalitarian governments found that they can best instill the views and values that the governments wanted by taking the children away from the parents' influence as soon as possible. Longer school days is also a means to increase the influence of the government and decrease that of the family.

There are lots of similar stories from other totalitarian countries, but even in Europe, similar if less extreme policies were followed. Take the creation of Sweden's extensive nursery school system. Declaring that "school is the spearhead of Socialism," Ingvar Carlsson, Sweden's education minister from 1969 to 1973 (and later prime minister), insisted that removing children from the home through "pre-school training is essential 'to eliminate the social heritage'" of undesirable, reactionary parental views. Sweden's income tax system was even set up to "get both parents out of the home, so that children are forced out as well."

The former Soviet Union, of course, went much further. During the 1920s and again in the 1950s went so far as raising millions of children in communal children's houses, dining halls, and other institutions that completely separated the children from their families.

Decades later during the Soviet war in Afghanistan, the Soviets forcibly transferred tens of thousands of three- and four-year-old Afghanis to the USSR. By educating the children away from their families, the Soviets hoped to instill Communist ideals and then return their subjects to Afghanistan years later as part of a loyal government administration.

Who influences the minds of the young is a continuing battle. In comparison to the average parent, unionized American teachers are obviously more liberal, more inclined to support government regulation and spending. While married women with children tend to be much more conservative than the average voter, 93 percent of the National Education Association donations from 1990 to 2008 went to Democrats.

Whether done consciously or not, American children spending more time away from their parents will at the very least further weaken families, causing greater separation in later years between parents and their children."

*John Lott is the author of Freedomnomics.

Home (description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)

Academic papers:

Social Science Research Network

Book Reviews:

For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.

List of my Op-eds

Posts by topic

Appalachian law school attack

Baghdad murder rate

Arming Pilots

Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me

The Merced Pitchfork Killings and Vin Suprynowicz's quote

Ayres and Donohue

Stanford Law Review

Mother Jones article


Craig Newmark

Eric Rasmusen

William Sjostrom

Dr. T's

Interview with National Review Online

Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide

The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott

Cold Comfort, Economist John Lott discusses the benefits of guns--and the hazards of pointing them out.

An interview with John R. Lott, Jr. author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws

Some data not found at

Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack

Since the first news search was done additional news stories have been added to Nexis:

There are thus now 218 unique stories, and a total of 294 stories counting duplicates (the stories in yellow were duplicates): Excel file for general overview and specific stories. Explicit mentions of defensive gun use increase from 2 to 3 now.

Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election

Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set

"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper