All Postings from January 2004
1/31/04Political Correctness Wins out over Common Sense
I suppose that it had to happen, but once it became public the New York Times had to rescind the permission that it gave its reporters to carry guns in a war zone. The reports will be accompanied by armed guards, but what can be the reason for not also allowing reporters to carry guns? Anyway, there was an interesting note in the piece about how a security guard with a gun saved the life of reporters this week.
1/28/04
The Economist has published a letter of mine commenting on their piece on armed robbery. It is particularly useful to see their figure on armed robbery rates over the last decade and see how these rates clearly went up after the 1997 law banning handguns. Clearly banning handguns haven't reduced armed robberies in Britain and if anything the effect has massively gone in the other direction. For a copy of the International Crime Victimization Survey go to here.
1/27/04
My newest op-ed is up on Foxnews.com and it examines a lot of the negative news coverage about athletes and guns. Discussions of the piece can be found here, here, and here.
1/26/04
I debated Gary Burtless from the Brookings Institution about the
"jobless" recovery last Friday on CNBC. I wish that we had more time to debate how many jobs have been created, but Burtless
agrees that the Establishment survey misses out on jobs created at new
companies and self-employed people.
John Stossel's top ten myths lists "Myth No. 3 �� Guns are Bad." A nice dose of realism about accidental gun death rates and the Brady Gun Control Law.
Hannity and Colmes' have more on the Chicago resident who used a gun to defend himself and his family against a criminal. See the 1/23 post for more on this.
1/25/04
Foxnews.com reports how "A woman passed through security screening at New York's LaGuardia Airport with a stun gun and knife in her purse."
1/23/04
Hale DeMar of Wilmette, Illinois used a gun to stop a criminal from breaking into his house. His children and wife were at home when the criminal broke into their house. Apparently three days after Christmas the same criminal had broken into the home so Mr. DeMar had some idea how long it would take for the police to arrive. The next night the criminal broke in again. Mr. DeMar had his gun registered with the state and kept in locked in a safe and stored it unloaded (as mandated by Illinois law). The problem wasn't that he used the gun improperly, the police say that he acted entirely properly. The problem was that handguns are banned in the city he lives in. Mr. DeMar published a discussion of the events yesterday in the Chicago Sun-Times and the Chicago Tribune.
For those interested, one of the better web sites that analyzes Bowling for Columbine can be found here.
1/18/04
Eric Helland and Alex Taborrak's paper in Advances in Economic Policy and Analysis uses a "placebo law" approach to test the impact of right-to-carry laws on crime rates. Unlike the clustering approach, the placebo approach can also solve autocorrelation problems and Helland and Tabarrok find that murder, rape and robbery rate trends fall consistently after right-to-carry laws are adopted. Examining county level crime data for the U.S. from 1977 to 1997 they find that:
I think that anyone interested in the research on guns and crime would benefit from looking at both papers.
1/16/04
For those who haven't seen it, Jeff Soyer's Weekly Check on the Bias regularly surveys how the news media covers guns every week. The report gets posted every Monday on his web site. It is definitely worth a look.
1/15/04
Two articles on CNSnews.com provide extensive discussions on all the obsticles that the TSA puts in the way of pilots getting a license to carry a gun as well as the rules on how pilots can use it.
1/13/04
My piece explaining why unemployment rates keep falling even though employment doesn't seem to be rising much is up on Foxnews.com. The answer? Hint: the numbers for the unemployment rate and the total number employed have been obtained from two different sources.
1/10/04
Professor Eric Rasmusen has an extensive discussion of the BBC poll as well as the fallout on his website. The poll has placed a Labor MP in a rather awkward spot. The Labor MP promised to introduce and support whatever proposed law received the most votes, but now finds himself supporting a bill "he predicts would be the mass slaughter of 16-year-olds with pump-action shotguns." At least a lot of the British public seems to understand the idea of deterrence. (One should note that this was not a "scientific" poll.)
1/9/04
With Governor Taft signing the concealed handgun law yesterday, only four states and the District of Columbia now ban citizens carrying concealed handguns (Wisconsin, Illinois, Kansas, and Nebraska). The Ohio law goes into affect on April 9th and it could be as long as 60 days after that before the first permits are issued. There is a good chance that Wisconsin's legislature will override their governor's veto next week, and later this year there will be a tough fight in Kansas with a possible override there. (As an interesting aside, DC actually has a may issue concealed handgun law on the books, but the problem is that a later law bans being able to own one.)
1/8/04
Given all the continuing anger directed towards George Bush by Democrats, it is interesting to note that John Kennedy probably lost the popular vote to Richard Nixon in 1960. At least the discussion provides some perspective.
1/6/04
My new op-ed in the New York Post examines the slow pace at which pilots are being put on planes.
1/2/04
My new piece on Foxnews.com is up. It examines a lot of defensive gun use stories during December that haven't gotten much attention.
1/1/04
The difference between Europe and the U.S. can be seen pretty sharply in how they respond to guns on planes. Many Europeans have a hard time accepting even armed sky marshals while Americans give overwhelming support for armed pilots in addition to marshals. My latest piece in the Wall Street Journal Europe is up and looks at the debate.
|
|