Letters in NY Post Responding to my piece on Felons Voting
HILLARY'S VOTE FOR FELONS
March 7, 2005 -- The fact that most people with felony convictions are poor, working-class citizens who might vote Democratic is not the issue, as John R. Lott Jr. and James K. Glassman seem to think ("The Felon Vote," Opinion, March 1).
How a citizen votes is not a prerequisite to having the right to vote.
The fact is, five Republican governors, including President Bush when he was governor of Texas, have realized that this is about fairness and basic rights.
They were some of the first state executives to urge reform of voting eligibility laws to allow more ex-prisoners to vote.
Their actions clearly signaled that this is a bipartisan issue about fairness and democracy — and not partisan politics as Lott and others proclaim.
The Count Every Vote Act offers solutions to voting inequities that have plagued our system for centuries. I say, let Congress finally have this debate.
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a mockery of public office.
Now Hillary wants to give felons the right to vote. She will apparently go to any length to get elected.
I would love to see the duo run — back to Arkansas.
The first letter misses the central point. With all the penalties that felons still face after they are released from prison, why is it that this is the one single penalty that Democrats are trying to remove. Why not restore their right to professional or business licenses? Why not their ability to work for the government or unions? Why not their ability to own a gun? it is hard to deny that this is being pushed by Democrats (and this change only for felons) because they believe that it helps them politically.