4/28/2006
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- Appearing on G. Gordon Liddy's Show Today
- More Gun Control Coming for Australia
- Who says that people can't adjust their behavior w...
- Tony Snow, Congratulations
- How to get a large set of land parcels together wi...
- May be there was another benefit from Fox hunting ...
- How could this be?: "Consumer Confidence Highest i...
- Mayor Bloomberg's Conference on Guns Today
- Bloomberg: "London Organized Crime `Out of Control...
- Reactions to what Politicians want to do on Gas
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
3 Comments:
The parralels with George Orwell's 1984 grow by the day, regardless that Orwell's real name was Blair.
Blair's govt has a largely urban base,
The working class have been legally dissarmed since the 1920's so gun control tends to play well with them
Labour gun controls can be sold to their supporters as hitting the class enemy (new labour or not, labour is not averse to scratching the scab off class hatred
- look at the fox hunting issue, that blair used to take the focus off his troubles time and again.
things like this take the heat off labour's failure to address problems of armed crime, poor education, and the fact that the growth of the british economy under labour is all in the state sector and at the expense of tax payers and business
I doubt whether the computer system will work,
even if it does, you have reported that the british police are unwilling to go near an armed criminal, even when called
the cctv coverage is pretty thorough in town centres (just watch those cameras follow a good looking girl down the street) but fall off as you move out from the centre.
what cctv seems to have been unable to do is keep armed crime down,
it keeps going up, and the cons are now less likely to go to court, less likely to get convicted and less likely to do time. and compared to the US spend less time behind bars if they do go to jail.
I forget what the relative figures are now, but you were about twice as likely to get mugged robbed or burgled in the UK as in the USA
and by excluding the gun ban centres like New York, I think the UK murder rate was also higher? please enlighten me on this last one.
one desirable side effect, if this is not money down the drain, would be arrests of people acting cock sure because they were carrying a labour party membership card...
Thanks for your comments. Your insights into the political process there are greatly appreciated.
They need a computer programme for this? Any halfway experienced American cop can spot a habitual pistol carrier in a heartbeat. In my home state, where it is legal, i habitually carry a .45 holstered on my right hip. once while travelling (unarmed) in New Jersey I stopped at a police station to ask local directions, and as i walked up to the duty desk sergeant he looked at me then his eyes went to my right hip where my sidearm usually rode. I'd been "made" at a glance, no problem, as above I was unarmed obeying New Jersey law, leaving my gun at home.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home