5/15/2006
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- Getting rid of standardized educational tests in C...
- Hugo Chavez's police blamed "for much of the [Vene...
- Are guns effectively banned in most US cities?
- New gun lock research from Australia
- John McCain Pro-Gun?
- Gov. Ed Rendell seeks mandate for more gun control...
- Canada's sponsorship scandal, finally the right am...
- Weapons grade uranium found again in Iran?
- Single Juror Kept Moussaoui from being Executed
- "twice as big a scandal as the [Canadian] sponsors...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
5 Comments:
Analog: If H5N1 crosses over to human-to-human transmission, we can never make enough vaccine to innoculate everyone, so why even try? Why even start?
See what I mean?
P.
If you want to control Mexican immigration then do it at the border, don't deport people after they have jobs, families (homes) and a lifestyle. That's the wrong way to treat people who came here to find a job and earn an honest living. This migration has been occurring for decades. Americans living near the border depend on immigration to nurture and sustain their economies.
From 1941 to 1945 the Germans identified, arrested, and MURDERED 6 million Jews.
Rounding up and deporting 12 million illegal aliens is quite doable.
Dear Last Anonymous:
Hitler may have accomplished this, but I would like to believe that we would find it more difficult simply because we wouldn't be anywhere near as ruthless.
Dear Dr. Lott,
I understand people's qualms with "illegal" immigration. First question, if it were made legal, would you still have a problem with it? Secondly, the rights that we strive to defend are granted to us by our "Creator"... they are pre-existing rights. The Bill of Rights is an affirmation of those inalienable rights. So the question I pose is, if these rights were "banned" by popular support of governmental regulation... does that mean we should all follow those laws??? I would assert that colonialists of the late 1700's wouldn't have. That is why I have qualms with so called conservative points of view on "illegal" immigration. It implies that they are willing to follow the law even if it violates their rights. This is no way to preserve them. It makes us sheep instead of leaders. While I'll agree that the migrant protests were offensive to Americans (displays of Mexican flags and what not), all Americans could learn from these acts of civil disobedience. It is what made this country in the first place... a bunch of "spoiled" royal subjects that refused to pay taxes for the expenses incurred by the British protecting the colonialists from the French (Frend & Indian war). We could all learn from the example set by the Sons of Liberty.
Yours Truly,
AD
Orange, CA
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home