6/11/2006
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- Reviewing Self-defense cases in Florida after stan...
- Like Chicago, West Virginia apparently has dead pe...
- Democrats won't let Delay Off the ballot
- "Democrats call Zarqawi killing a stunt"
- "Burgled [UK] MP wants home stun guns"
- New Orleans Police Chief backs off New Threat to t...
- So will Canadians Become more Sympathetic to Ameri...
- NRA v. Gun Owners of America Differences
- Rudy Giuliani most popular national politician
- May be everyone does understand the importance of ...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
2 Comments:
I just read (well, mostly read) a series of INCREDIBLY long screeds on the subject at a site called combatreform.com. Basically, their whole hobby-horse is that the army has 13,000 M-113 APCs, most of which are in storage, that should be used instead of Humvees for non-linear warfare.
The Humvee is a non-combat vehicle designed to ferry men and material to the outer lines of battle, but since every single unit is technically on the front, any rubber-tired truck vehicle is too vulnerable for use.
The M-113, on the other hand, weighs 10 tons (the up-armored Humvees weigh 6), and with modern birdcage setups or reactive armor, coupled with ballistic shields for the gunners, and hybrid-electric drives, will be easily as capable as the Humvee in some ways and far more effective in others, including pure combat abuse.
But since it's a tracked vehicle, the army considers it "heavy", even though it's smaller than the Stryker, which has rubber tires and is generally considered to be a deadly boondoggle.
It's a pretty venomous rant, but it's not without merit.
Thanks, Scott. I appreciate the insight.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home