CT Mayor Carries Concealed Handgun in City Offices, Creates Concern

Mayor James R. Miron is taking some heat for allegedly packing heat.

A Town Council leader and some town workers say Miron has taken a handgun into his Town Hall office and town council meetings, raising concerns about public safety and making them uncomfortable, the Connecticut Post reported Sunday. Some say they have seen the mayor with a gun at both his hip and strapped to his ankle.

Miron, 41, a lawyer and retired Marine, refused to confirm or deny that he carries weapons to Town Hall or meetings. But he defended his right to do so.

"If I do carry guns to Town Hall, I would never admit that for personal safety reasons and my own right to privacy," said Miron, a Democrat. "I don't want someone intent on firing a gun at me or anyone else knowing if I carry guns or not."

Miron said he has had a gun permit since 1999. Local police say he had a town permit that expired last year. The mayor says he now has a state permit that allows him to carry guns anywhere in the state. He said the only reason he would fire his weapon is to defend himself or to save another person's life.

Under state permits, weapons must be concealed at all times, police say. Records on gun permits are not accessible by the public.

"It is my right to carry guns, and it is also my right not to confirm when and where I carry them," Miron said.

James Feehan, a Republican and chairman of the Town Council, told the newspaper that he saw the mayor carrying two guns at the same time _ one strapped to the ankle and the other under his suit jacket _ during a council meeting within the past few months.

"As a gun owner myself, I believe the mayor certainly has the right to carry a gun or guns as long as he has a legal permit," Feehan said. "However, if his guns are making Town Hall employees and citizens uncomfortable, as I have been told, I would ask that he cease and desist immediately. . . . .


Blogger saturdaynightspecial said...

A little discomfort never hurt anyone.

10/09/2006 3:48 PM  
Blogger Merc05h said...

I don't see where someone's discomfort on 'seeing' a handgun that is for all intents and purposes consealed, violates their rights. Too 'touchy feelie for me'. Tell the guy to have a latte and shut up!

10/12/2006 12:23 PM  
Blogger Merc05h said...

Give the poor guy a cup of coffee and help him with his discomfort..... Better yet, send him to a sensitivity course on 'Understanding and Overcomming YOUR discomfort over others exercising their rights'. More PC, don't you think. Good God, when are we going to return to Men being Men. We can't even fight a war correctly for trying not to hurt someone's feelings while killing them so they don't kill us!

10/12/2006 12:27 PM  
Anonymous John said...

In this day and age, who could make a cogent argument for victim disarmament?

We've seen several times in recent U.S. history what happens when we artificially create a predator-friendly zone.


10/19/2006 2:22 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home