8/31/2007
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- Is this really a gun control picture?
- Evolution explains why women like shopping
- Banning Tag at School
- Arming Police on Campus?
- Concealed Handgun Permits in Michigan
- When Trade Protection and Environmentalism Collide...
- Glenn Beck's Radio Show (Updated)
- Transcript of Senator Larry Craig's Police Intervi...
- West Virginia has 82,000 Permits
- Concealed Handgun Permits Fall Dramatically in New...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
5 Comments:
In John Lott's (and Sonya Jones') Fox News article "The Endangered Species Act Out of Control" tells the reader that:
'Hatchery fish (Columbia/Snake River Salmon) have a higher survival rate from egg to smolt, but a lower survival rate from smolt to adult. Yet, that is hardly surprising. Many of the weaker naturally spawned fish have die off as hatchlings, leaving fewer of them to die off in the next stage.'
The authors here show there math illiteracy and try to pass their conclusion as "hardly surprising".
Does anyone else notice the authors error? Apparently the Fox News editorial staff. (For a clue, consider the difference between number and ratio).
Are we to believe that "weaker" fish are destined to die somewhere and it is just a fluke that hatchery fish survive to smolt stage and only to die off later (at higher rates than non-hatchery fish)?
The moral: when a lawyer is an author one must be suspicious of their motive.
To stay current on the plight of Idaho's wild Salmon and Steelhead regularly visit www.bluefish.org
Dear Anonymous:
"Are we to believe that "weaker" fish are destined to die somewhere and it is just a fluke that hatchery fish survive to smolt stage and only to die off later (at higher rates than non-hatchery fish)?"
Weaker fish are not "destined" to necessarily die, but they are more likely to die. I don't see the math error. If X percent of the fish have some weaknesses that make it hard for them to survive, if those fish don't die in the first stage because they are protected, why is it hard to believe that they are more likely to die in the next stage of life?
Whether the Salmon are hatchery or "Natural" fish determining what species they belong to is like saying that any child born to parents who are not married is not a human. Further, when all salmon returning to a particular stream are automatically captured by the hatchery -- as is the case. You systematically eliminate the "Natural" fish from that particular watershed. This is absurd!.
Using the arguments that "human interference" and "unnatural" ways of reproducing creates a different species, it could be argued that the original California Condor no longer exists, since the entire population flying around was captive bred.
what a lot of bluster with no understanding to back it up!
it's great for PLF that FOX gave them a venue for such a misleading PR piece. it's just a shame you signed on dr. lott; that patina of academic legitimacy you add probably fooled a few more folks into believing the spin.
for those interested in the truth: the ESA as applied to pacific salmon is concerned not with species population totals, but with "evolutionarily significant units", essentially discrete local populations. see http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/laws/esa/ for more info.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home