7/11/2006
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- National Education Association: "Pays Opponents Of...
- Lott v. Levitt Response FIled
- 12 Year Old South Carolina Boy Saves Family by Bra...
- The only type of defensive gun use case that the N...
- Ann Coulter's publisher and syndication group don'...
- 3 AM Home Breakin Stopped with Gun
- Blue State, Red State, Mexican Style
- Do hunter safety classes matter?
- Rod Blagojevich again on guns: will Southern Illin...
- Impossible to believe news: Ann Coulter accused of...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
3 Comments:
Does this explain why the same phenomena exist in other places in the country where people can't freely carry guns?
I think that it helps explain the relative drops for a lot of the country (40 states have now passed right-to-carry laws). The question is not that the crime rate can't also fall in the other states, but that the drop will not be as large and that those states that issue the most permits have the biggest drops in violent crime.
"Does this explain why the same phenomena exist in other places in the country where people can't freely carry guns?"
In states that favor banning firearms pressure is on police and government to lower crime rates or reduce crime; to do this they (police) will violate civil rights. For example, police will eavsdrop without court permission more often. In states where firearms are banned there are more police. In states where firearms are banned there are more rules. In states where firearms are banned there is less freedom and more government agents looking over your shoulder. Chicago employs over 12,000 police. None of my opinons are based on any factual statististical reasearch, only my observation.
And finally, crime rates are dropping everywhere at the same time that gun ownership is rising everywhere. But crime drops because of what is on the tv medium: the tv show COPS (Fox network) is a reality based show edited (falsified) to show those predisposed to commit crime that they are up against a superior force (police) that have almost magical powers to catch criminals. Another show [America's Most wanted] makes it easier to catch criminals which deters crime.
Police have also adopted techniques from the military to catch drug dealers (without regard for observing and respecting civil rights); selling drugs is the major source of crime in America, so lowering drug crime will show major drops in crime rates.
And last, police, and government, have learned to distort the number of incidents of crime to lower crime rates. Especially in states that ban firearms. Never trust politicians (government) that oppose gun possession because they don't follow rules and because they'll resort to anything to prove they are right - including restricting freedom.
In states that allow firearm possession their citizens are more free; not only from a civil liberty focus but in a psychological or healthy focus too. If an intruder is on your doorstep you can shoot him yourself - you can make this decision - you don't have to waste time deciding if you must call police - YOU DON'T HAVE TO STAND THERE LIKE A HELPLESS WIMP AND ASK FOR HELP FROM GOVERNMENT TO DO SOMETHING YOU YOURSELF COULD EASILY DO !! In states that ban firearm possession citizens are forced to rely on the lower quality services of government to provide for their safety, which is not safe but more dangerous. Domestic disarmament is degrading for all but gun phobes, and nurtures a sick society into becoming more dependent on government.
Crime rates are dropping because a sick government (that bans freedom)is distorting the truth and dictates to it's citizenry while most Americans, including it's criminals, refuse to believe government would ever behave this way. The war against guns, and drugs, nurtures a war against freedom, and encourages government to become bigger and bullyer, and teaches Americans to depend on government for everything. That's why the NRA is calling the war against guns a war to destroy our freedom.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home