9/20/2006
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- "[National Academies of Science] denies gender dif...
- Canadia's Prime Minister Stephen Harper Vowing to ...
- Elderly Jewish man in Russia uses weapon to defend...
- Luby's restaurant shooting's impact 15 years later...
- More reaction to the Pope's comments on Islam
- University of Utah backs down on its gun ban
- A funny joke from Don Kates
- Swedish vote for letting citizens shoot wolves
- More on whether violent crime is increasing
- Michael Steele putting up a tough campaign in Mary...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
4 Comments:
Does this mean that the House Democratic leaders don't think that there would be any any "minority, elderly and disabled voters who lean" Republican would not also feel disenfranchised? We need ID's for everything else in this country but not for our most important basic right - the right to vote? It's one of the perks for legal citizenship.
sonictek
First, the article says the costs of *helping* the poor obtain IDs would be covered. This does not mean that all or even any of the costs to the poor are covered, but only that the feds will make grants to (presumably) states and localities that can be spent in various ways short of ensuring that every would-be voter gets an ID card without cost to themselves. Moreover, those government units charged with implementing the help programs will have strong party-based incentives to help selectively.
Second, even costs that those of us who are not poor might consider trivial (e.g., transportation to wherever cards are given out, obtaining information about the ID requirement, etc.) are significant costs to the poorest among us.
We had a similar law in Missouri struck down by a judge as 'unconstitutional'. Same BS reasons as the dems gave against this one, will disenfranchise poor, elderly, and minority voters.
We even had a provision in the law to go to people's homes and provide an ID free of charge for people unable to get to a license office. Didn't do any good.
They have one thing right, though... these laws will prevent millions of people from voting. The ones who are in this country illegally!
Dear Second Anonymous:
You might want to see my research on this topic. I don't believe that there is any evidence in either the US or in other countries (such as Mexico) that these rules discourage any particular group of voters, including the poor.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home