Bush administration pushes for more armed pilots on international flights
Labels: ConcealedCarry, GunControl
Welcome! Please e-mail me with any questions at johnrlott@aol.com.
Labels: ConcealedCarry, GunControl
posted by John Lott at 1:46 PM
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
2 Comments:
Why, when there are so few armed pilots on domestic flights? This administration has done very little to comply with Congress’ wishes for arming pilots. In fact there are more roadblocks placed in front of the pilots than there are aids to get them armed.
Bob has a point about the Bush administration resisting arming commercial airline pilots. For reasons beyond most Americans, who overwhelmingly supported the idea after 9/11, Bush fought hard against arming pilots and enhancements continued to come grudgingly. This move to broaden coverage to international flights is a clear step in the right direction. Clearly armed pilots are the most cost-effective method of deterring and/or dealing with another catatrophic hijacking by terrorists (or a madman), so the resistance has been befuddling. Was President Bush siding with airline CEO's who didn't want the program for equally mysterious reasons? Was it a general hostility to organized labor being granted status in the eyes of the public? The Federal Flight Deck Officer program is evolving and may or may not become a program which better serves the public, depending on policy made at the top levels of our federal government in the next few months.
Currently there are many thousands of pilots who volunteer to fly armed every day. The government FFDO program, now administered by the Federal Air Marshall department of the Transportations Security Administration (a good recent move - we'll always need FAMS to protect passengers in the cabin and prevent terrorist attack prior to them knocking on the fortified cockpit door - but FAMS can never be on every flight so the marriage is a team effort and FAM funding should never be curtailed just because even more pilots might fly armed in the future), provides the initial FFDO psychological and criminal background screening, week long training (initial and a shorter recurrent program twice a year), equipment and duty ammunition to pilots. Airlines are not required to give pilots time off for training - a deterrent to many pilots. Pilots are responsible for arranging their own time off and some of their own transportation (the flying part would be space available provided by the airline industry and some bus service is provided by the government) and pay for lodging and meals while training - other deterrents. They also pay for their own range time and practice ammunition between required recurrent firearms training, although the government does allow these expenses to be tax deductible (as well they should).
It is a great program that should be enhanced with a few more benefits, yet not made more of a hassle or expense for pilots. International flights absolutely should be included. We can and should demand our legislators make the program more attractive to pilots, who are always there and always willing to defend their crew, passengers, aircraft and fellow citizens on the ground from terrorist attack. Americans intelligently perceive that since they already trust their lives and welfare to professional pilots, among the most scrutinized, randomly drug and alcohol screened and medically evaluated workers in the world, training and authorizing them to responsibly handle firearms is a no-brainer decision.
If you agree, please contact your elected federal representatives and urge them to support the FFDO program.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home