5/18/2006
About Me
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
E-mail: johnrlott@aol.com
Academic Papers
- Terms of Use
Copyright 2005 by John R. Lott, Jr. All rights reserved
My Op-eds
Reviews of Freedomnomics
Previous Posts
- "New NRA Campaign Asks Lawmakers to Pledge Not to ...
- If McCain’s going to claim he’s a conservative on ...
- Verdict on Canadian Gun Registry
- Tony Snow, Knocks Them Dead in His First Full Blow...
- 54% of Canadians Support Scrapping Gun Registry
- Bizarre Patents
- Texas raises maximum speed limit to 80 MPH
- Comments of Canadian Police on The Canadian Gun Re...
- Note on claim that we can't deport 12 million ille...
- Getting rid of standardized educational tests in C...
Book Reviews
- For a list of book reviews on The Bias Against Guns, click here.
Interesting Past Topics
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Links
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Data
- Johnlott.org
(description of book, downloadable data sets, and discussions of previous controversies)
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
More Books of Mine
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
3 Comments:
This whole "proof of need" canard really bugs me whenever I hear it...not to mention the fact that the people that have assumed the authority to judge 'need' are not interested in 'proof', but rather in shifting the definitions of 'need' and 'proof', and securing themselves as an elite capable of granting concessions to the pleas of their subjects.
Is 'the state' in any position to guarantee total safety? If so, what liability does it accept for failure? If not, by what notion of justice do they deny the liberty to compensate for their incompetence?
Whenever the 'State' does for the citizen then the outcome is rarely, if ever, as good as when the people (the individual) does for itself. This applies to self protection from harm. One's personal safety is a personal responsibility not a 'State' responsibility. When citizens do otherwise then many of them will be harmed.
But in this case the outcome will matter mostly by what their media advises them - to arm themselves or to let the 'State' protect them.
I was in S Africa a few weeks back,
I'd be interested to know the cross section of people questioned for this;
was it whites and coloureds in Joburg who have to put up with running the daily gauntlet of car jackings, home invasions etc
was it young blacks who boycotted school during the last years of aparthied, and who support seriel rapist, multiple murderer of women and crown prince for the leadership, Zuma, because he is the one likely to ennact Mugabe like policies
("screw the consequences, at least he'll hurt the whites and asians")
Was it capetown liberals, who read oxfam Canada's report "a gun free south africa"
Worth every penny the south africans paid for it...
or was it the older generation of black guys who can see through the populism and are dreading the death of Mandella for the Zulu -Xhosa power struggle that will ensue
Zulus refer to the Xhosa dominated government bodies as the "Xhosa Nostra"
Just before I left, a cop shot 8 people, including his partner and baby, and several colleagues, with his service pistol.
Certainly one isolated example of why guns should only be used by those wearing the uniform of the state eh?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home