Why are people unhappy with the economy?
The economy 39 Approve 57 Disapprove
Welcome! Please e-mail me with any questions at johnrlott@aol.com.
posted by John Lott at 10:21 AM
Amazed how lucky I am that I have had jobs where I could just think about whatever I wanted to think about. This summer I will be moving to the University of Maryland. Previously I held positions at the University of Chicago, Yale University, Stanford, UCLA, Wharton, and Rice and was the chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission during 1988 and 1989. I have published over 90 articles in academic journals. I received my Ph.D. in economics from UCLA in 1984.
-Research finding a drop in violent crime rates from Right-to-carry laws
-Ranking Economists
-National Academies of Science Panel on Firearms
-Baghdad murder rate
-Arming Pilots
-Appalachian law school attack
-Sources for Defensive Gun Uses
-The Merced Pitchfork Killings
-Fraudulent website pretending to be run by me
-Steve Levitt's Correction Letter
-Ian Ayres and John Donohue
-Other issues regarding Steve Levitt
-General discussion of my 1997 and 2002 surveys as well as related surveys
-Problems with Wikipedia
-Errata for Gun Books
Economist and Law Professor David D. Friedman's Blog
Economist Robert G. Hansen's Blog
A debate that I had with George Mason University's Robert Ehrlich on guns
Lyonette Louis-Jacques's page on Firearms Regulation Worldwide
An interview concerning More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws
The End of Myth: An Interview with Dr. John Lott
Art DeVany's website, one of the more innovative economists in the last few decades
St. Cloud State University Scholars
Bryan Caplan at George Mason University
Alphecca -- weekly review on the media's coverage of guns
Xrlq -- Some interesting coverage of the law.
Career Police Officer
Gun Law News
Georgia Right-to-Carry
Darnell's The Independent Conservative Blog
Clayton Cramer's Blog
My hidden mathematical ability (a math professor with the same name)
geekwitha45
My Old AEI Web Page
Wrightwing's blog
Al Lowe's blog
St. Maximos' Hut
Dad29
Sonya Jones takes on the Enviros
Eric Rasmusen
William Sjostrom
Dr. T's EconLinks.com
Interview with National Review Online
Updated Media Analysis of Appalachian Law School Attack
Journal of Legal Studies paper on spoiled ballots during the 2000 Presidential Election
Data set from USA Today, STATA 7.0 data set
"Do" File for some of the basic regressions from the paper
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe?
5 Comments:
Since his (Bush) folly into Iraq my home equity loan rate doubled, fuel prices nearly doubled, and my freedom was cut in half. And, he spends billions of US taxdollars on a wealthy Arab oil producing country. On top of that almost 60% of income goes back to at least one level of government to pay a tax - sixty percent - the government has more than doubled our costs to purchase anything, and that is how it is able to further erode prosperity and freedom in America.
All that further leads to producing another generation of government cheerleaders that believes the government can do no wrong; and that being the socialist/police state we currently are is the way to go. It is one of the reasons people believe the 2nd amendment is no longer applicable.
over the last couple of years interest rates were at all times lows. The rates have simply gone up closer to what they have been over time, though they are still a little low. Gas prices have gone up, but other prices have FALLEN, and over all inflation remains extremely low.
interest rates were low; that's why I purchased the loan. If I had to do it over again I wouldn't. Without Bush rates would be where they should be.
I agree prices are not high, but it goes against the grain to spend billions in a wealthy oil producing Arab country (for nothing too). Especially when I know the war is also used as a justification to erode freedom here in America.
Well, SNS, the rates over the last few years were at historically low levels so it is not obvious why you say that they were at where they should be. You have to go back to the Great Depression to get similarly low rates. Here you had such low rates with real strong economic growth and low unemployment and stable overall prices. My advice would have been to gotten locked in at the historically low rates rather than to have assumed that they would always remain at those unusually low rates.
It's good advice, but who would have expected a foolish US occupation in Iraq that costs the government a couple $billion per week. That amount of government spending is the only reason for the rise in the cost of debt. I'm betting the feds have kept the rate too low for the benefit of Bush and his war on terror. Home sales are dropping which may indicate the cost of investing in real estate is now too high.
I agree that the economy isn't bad, but because so many have defended the government's war on terror some things are being covered up. And if the government has too much debt then things can get bad at any time. If anything we will never have a reduction in income taxes if the government has a long term obligation to pay off a large amount of debt. That's the part that can't be good.
And what happens if we have more disasters? How is Bush paying for all the aid after the multiple hurricanes in Florida and after Katrina too. There has to be an unusually high amount of government debt that is not being talked about.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home